Activity

Date

Publication of the call

September 12

Receipt of resumes

Starts september 13

Ends September 25

Verification of compliance with requirements

September 26 to October 04

Publication of results Compliance with minimum requirements.

Receipt of complaints up to 2 working days after publication

October 5

Resume assessment

October 6 to 22

Publication of resume assessment results.

Receipt of complaints up to 2 working days after publication

October 25

Period for submission of essays

October 25 to 27

Evaluation of tests

October 28 to November 04

Publication of results of Evaluation of trials.

Receipt of complaints up to 2 working days after publication

November 8

Interviews

November 9 to 18

Issuance of resolution with list of eligible

November 21 to 25

Publication of final results

November 28

Period for bringing an action for reconsideration

November 29 to December 01

Period for responding to replenishment resources

02 to 09 December

1. Receipt and verification of documents: The Academic Subdirectorate of IPRED identifies that the applicant has provided the documents required for registration.

2. Formation of the Selection Committee of Candidates of Tutors: As established in Agreement 105 of 1999, which indicates that this body will be responsible for carrying out the entire evaluation process and which will establish evaluation formats and weighting of scores for the tests.

3. Verification of requirements: The Selection Committee of Tutor Candidates verifies that the resumes meet the minimum requirements demanded for the profile to which they are submitted.

4. Assessment of resume: The Selection Committee of Candidates of Tutors carries out the evaluation of the resume based on the criteria established in Agreement 105 of 1999. The Coordination of each program informs each candidate of the result of the evaluation and the step to follow (evaluation of the essay and interview) for those who obtain scores of 24 or higher. Candidates who score below 24 do not continue in the process.

5. Evaluation of the essay: The Selection Committee of Candidates of Tutors carries out the evaluation of the essay delivered according to the defined criteria, to the applicants who met the minimum score in the previous step. The test must be publicly supported.

6. Interview: The Selection Committee of Tutor Candidates will schedule the interviews according to criteria defined at the beginning of the process.

7. Publication of results: The Selection Committee of Candidates of Tutors prepares minutes in which it registers the evaluations of the candidates and sends it to the IPRED Address for the publication of the corresponding resolution.

Those interested in participating in the call must complete the registration form and upload in PDF format the 3 files listed below:

• 1 PDF file with the application letter.
• 1 PDF file with the results of the background (no more than 30 days).
• 1 PDF file with the resume in the format of the UIS and supports of what is reported in the resume (copy of the degrees and degree certificates, teaching and work experience, academic productivity, certifications, etc.)

It is important that contact details such as cell phone number, landline number and email are correct and up-to-date, so that communication can be established in a timely manner at the time required.

Delivery of the Essay:

• The assessment of the essay will be carried out for those applicants who pass the stages of review of requirements and the assessment of the resume. This test must be prepared taking into account the following guidelines and on the dates established in the schedule of the call:

• Context of the essay: Distance Education is understood as that modality in which the formative experiences occur, for the most part, without requiring concurrence in a specific physical space. That is, “distance” regularly refers to that spatio-temporal separation between educational agents (administrative, students and tutors). For this reason, the characteristic of this modality has been the use of different means to support learning, the construction of knowledge and to carry out the processes of accompaniment and monitoring. This modality contemplates the development of synchronous meetings, some of them face-to-face.

On the other hand, in the virtual modality, the maximum use of online technologies is made, in such a way that, asynchronous activities take great presence, and the meetings that are carried out synchronously are advanced online (educational agents can be anywhere). Thus, and in the context of these modalities, it is clear that, for theoretical tutorials, priority is usually given to the development of synchronous activities mediated by ICT.

• Theme: Feedback and tutor-student interaction are of great importance for the learning processes of students, aspects included in the minimum quality criteria of educational projects of academic programs! In that sense, write an argumentative essay answering the question: How would you implement tutor-student feedback and interaction within the framework of your academic activities, and what strategies would you consider relevant for the associated continuous monitoring and improvement?

• The argumentative essay must be submitted in PDF format, have between 700 and 1000 words, with Arial font size 11, a line spacing of 1.5 and margins 2 cm x2 cm x2 cm x2 cm (represents an approximate extension of 2 pages).

• The subject of the postulated profile that is being used as a basis in the construction of the essay must be declared.

• If you are applying to profiles from different academic programs, you will need to submit one essay for each program. If they are profiles of the same academic program, you only have to send an essay.

• The criteria to be evaluated are: Organization, coherence and relevance, Use of language, Argumentative and creative capacity, Validity of the concepts addressed, Updated reference of the bibliography.

• The essay must be submitted in PDF format in the “Essay” button.

Explanatory notes

• A person can apply to several profiles of a program, if he considers that he meets the requirements of each one.

• If you opt to enroll in two or more programs, separate enrollment must be made for each program. In this condition it is clarified that, for each program, a resume and its supports must be presented.

• The documentation submitted by the applicants on the established dates will be the only one that will be taken into account in the evaluation process. The university, by decision of the Academic Deputy Director of the IPRED, may require the correction of defects in a simple way in the documents provided, during the stage of receipt and verification of documents.

• Incomplete resumes are not received.

• The University reserves the right to verify the information entered by the applicant in the resume.

• The call for the headquarters and CAES, is aimed at professionals residing in these municipalities or their areas of influence. This condition does not apply to subjects declared as virtual within the profiles of the Technology in Pharmacy Regency program.

• The entire process of the call is carried out based on Agreement 105 of 1999 and Resolution 1915 of 2009.